![]() ![]() But where do we go? Where do we find further alternative sources of funding and ideas? In the 1990s, the Government introduced developer funding for rescue excavations, and the Lottery as a source of funding for the heritage generally. One represents danger, the other represents opportunity.”Īrchaeology has become dependent on government money, and therefore vulnerable to government cuts. “When written in Chinese the word ‘crisis’ is composed of two characters. These will be the building-blocks of archaeology’s future identifying them now is the only way to build a clear design and mission for the years ahead. It is time to stop amidst the doom and gloom and take stock of the positives. There is a lot of fear - firstly for the inevitable loss of jobs, but also for the knock-on effects on other sectors of archaeology. It is clear that tough times are coming for professional archaeology, which is still on its knees in the wake of the credit crunch. ![]() What more can be said about the recent government cuts? English Heritage has been cut by 32%, and the rest of the proposed reductions are equally horrific. But is it all bad news? Instead of just being about mass unemployment, lower wages, and fear, could it be that this is a chance to repurpose, do things better, and bring archaeology into the 21st century? ‘ As the government threatens to cut all its budgets, CA decided to ask a tough question of our colleagues: ` The budget cuts have major implications for archaeology. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |